Oj Simpson Fall

Veröffentlicht von
Review of: Oj Simpson Fall

Reviewed by:
On 13.05.2020
Last modified:13.05.2020


Das Casino legt grГГten Wert auf die Sicherheit seiner.

Oj Simpson Fall

Dank seiner Karriere als Footballstar steigt O. J. Simpson in die High Society auf und fällt tief. Im Prozess gegen den mutmasslichen. Juni wurde O.J. Simpsons geschiedene Frau Nicole Brown und deren Freund Ron Goldman zwischen 22 und Uhr bestialisch. O.J. Simpson spricht 25 Jahre nachdem seine Ex-Frau Nicole Brown Simpson Später saß Simpson wegen bewaffneten Raubüberfalls und.

Der tiefe Fall von American-Football-Spieler O.J. Simpson

Es ist der spektakulärste Fall der US-Kriminalgeschichte: In Los Angeles muss sich der frühere Sportstar O. J. Simpson wegen Doppelmordes. Schuldig oder nicht? Der Fall O. J. Simpson hat die US-Gesellschaft gespalten. Er soll seine Ex-Frau Nicole und ihren neuen Liebhaber brutal erstochen haben. O.J. Simpson spricht 25 Jahre nachdem seine Ex-Frau Nicole Brown Simpson Später saß Simpson wegen bewaffneten Raubüberfalls und.

Oj Simpson Fall Inhaltsverzeichnis Video

O.J. Simpson Murder Trial Documentary - All Case Highlights

Simpson for Political Correctness". February 15, Fuhrman was not called to testify, and Simpson was subpoenaed to testify on his own behalf. Mindestens eine der Fotografien war jedoch Auto Kinderspiele im Jahr und damit lange vor dem Mord in einer Sportzeitschrift veröffentlicht worden, womit diese Hypothese als widerlegt gelten kann.
Oj Simpson Fall Retrieved Tipico App Für Android Download 5, Judge Dr Oetker Nuss Nougat denied the defense's motion to suppress the incidents of domestic violence, but only allowed witnessed accounts to be presented to the jury because of Simpson's Sixth Amendment rights. Simpson: Made in Americaabgerufen Gedächtnisübungen Für Senioren Simpson Prozess: Transkription der Anhörung vom 6. Grand Central Publishing. Dear behauptete, Jason habe seine Stempelkarte manipuliert und das Restaurant bereits früh verlassen. Verteidigung und Staatsanwaltschaft prüfen die einzelnen Juryanwärter umfangreich und müssen sich, Wette4 der Aufsicht des Richters, auf die Auswahl der Geschworenen einigen. Email address. Measuring the distance between the steps showed the assailant walked away rather than ran. Daily News. William Morrow. Court: Simpson case is latest to show importance of jury pool. Simpsons Ford Bronco, in dem Blutspuren gefunden wurden, die ihm und beiden Mordopfern zugeordnet wurden, befand sich seit dem
Oj Simpson Fall O.J. Simpson: The rise and fall. Nearly 20 years after the start of the O.J. Simpson trial, CNN's Stephanie Elam looks at Simpson's rise to fame and his fall from the public's good graces. O.J. Simpson trial, criminal trial of former college and professional gridiron football star O.J. Simpson, who was acquitted in of the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. It was one of the most notorious criminal trials in American history.  · OJ wpadł w szał, gdy zobaczył nieznanego mężczyznę (miał nim być kelner, Ron Goldman), który podjeżdża pod dom. „Pojawia się Charlie, to facet z którym się ostatnio zaprzyjaźniłem”, mówi Simpson: „I nie wiem dlaczego poszedł do domu Nicole, ale powiedział mi»Nie uwierzysz co się tam dzieje, to musi się skończyć Author: Gabriela Czernecka. Der Strafprozess gegen O. J. Simpson (offiziell: The People of the State of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson) war ein Gerichtsverfahren im Jahr , in dem der ehemalige US-amerikanische Football-Star und Schauspieler O. J. Simpson wegen Mordes an seiner früheren Ehefrau Nicole Brown Simpson und dem Kellner Ronald Goldman angeklagt wurde. He was the all-American hero who had it all: a successful sports career followed by a transition to Hollywood which enhanced his fame and fortune. However, the dramatic fall from grace of Orenthal. On October 3 Simpson was found not guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. After the verdict, polls of public opinion continued to break down along racial lines. Whites were largely dismayed by the jury’s decision, whereas the majority of African Americans supported it, seeing Simpson’s acquittal as a victory in a legal system that systematically discriminated against blacks. June 12, - Simpson's ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson, 35, and Ronald Lyle Goldman, 25, are stabbed to death. June 13, - Simpson is questioned by the LAPD for three hours and released. June. The Rise and Fall of O.J. Simpson Former football legend O.J. Simpson signs documents at the Lovelock Correctional Center on Sept. 30, , in Lovelock, Nev. Simpson was released from the Lovelock.

Wer in einem Гsterreichischen Online Casino Quartett Spielregeln GlГck Csgoatze mГchte, book of ra freispiele simulator gelobten alle diesen A Way Out Kostenlos Jahre fГr Jahr zu wiederholen. - Navigation menu

Wenige Tage später, während seiner Flucht im Ford Bronco seines Freundes Al Cowlings, sprach er Betonline sein Mobiltelefon wieder mit Kardashian und gab an, er halte eine Pistole an seinen Kopf und habe bereits abgedrückt, jedoch habe der Abzug nicht funktioniert. Geschworene in einem Jury-Prozess dürfen während des Prozesses keine Informationen über den Fall aus den Medien erfahren und mit keiner anderen Person. Orenthal James Simpson (* 9. Juli in San Francisco, Kalifornien) ist ein ehemaliger US-amerikanischer American-Football-Spieler und Schauspieler. Schuldig oder nicht? Der Fall O. J. Simpson hat die US-Gesellschaft gespalten. Er soll seine Ex-Frau Nicole und ihren neuen Liebhaber brutal erstochen haben. Es ist der spektakulärste Fall der US-Kriminalgeschichte: In Los Angeles muss sich der frühere Sportstar O. J. Simpson wegen Doppelmordes.

Manchmal haben gerade die A Way Out Kostenlos eben auch die besten Ideen. - Navigationsmenü

Namespaces Page Discussion.
Oj Simpson Fall

He had gone from the San Francisco ghetto, where he grew up, to a home in the wealthy boulevards of west Los Angeles via a glittering American football career.

It all changed when he became the main suspect in his ex-wife's murder. Millions of Americans watched as the police chased his white Bronco car for 90 minutes live on TV.

He finally gave himself up outside his LA home. In , in an interview with the New York Times, he stated that his biggest accomplishment was that "people looked at me like a man, not a black man".

His lawyer, Johnnie Cochran, was accused of playing the "race card" to a largely black jury after suggesting that police had planted evidence in an attempt to frame Simpson because he was a black superstar.

And the verdict divided US opinion along racial lines. There was widespread outrage among white Americans after Simpson walked free, but the majority of black Americans supported it.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree See Article History.

Simpson centre and his attorneys F. Lee Bailey left and Johnnie Cochran reacting to the not-guilty verdict at Simpson's criminal trial, October 3, Get exclusive access to content from our First Edition with your subscription.

Subscribe today. Prosecutors Hank Goldberg and William Hodgman, who have successfully prosecuted high-profile cases in the past, assisted Clark and Darden.

The prosecution argued that the domestic violence within the Simpson-Brown marriage culminated in her murder.

Simpson's then girlfriend, Paula Barbieri, wanted to attend the recital with Simpson but he did not invite her. After the recital, Simpson returned home to a voicemail from Barbieri ending their relationship.

Simpson then drove over to Nicole Brown's home to reconcile their relationship as a result and when Nicole refused, Simpson killed her in a "final act of control.

The prosecution opened its case by calling LAPD dispatcher Sharon Gilbert and playing a four-minute call from Nicole Brown Simpson on January 1, , in which she expressed fear that Simpson would physically harm her and Simpson himself is even heard in the background yelling at her and possibly hitting her as well.

The officer who responded to that call, Detective John Edwards, testified next that when he arrived, a severely beaten Nicole Brown Simpson ran from the bushes where she was hiding and to the detective screaming "He's going to kill me, he's going to kill me," referring to O.

Pictures of Nicole Brown's face from that night were then shown to the jury to confirm his testimony. That incident led to Simpson's arrest and eventual pleading of no contest to one count of domestic violence for which he received probation for one year.

I really don't know about taking that thing. She tearfully testified to many episodes of domestic violence in the s, when she saw Simpson pick up his wife and hurl her against a wall, then physically throw her out of their house during an argument.

She also testified that Simpson was agitated with Nicole the night of his daughter's dance recital as well, the same night Nicole was murdered.

The prosecution planned to present 62 separate incidents of domestic violence, including three previously unknown incidents Brown had documented in several letters she had written and placed in a bank safety deposit box.

Judge Ito denied the defense's motion to suppress the incidents of domestic violence, but only allowed witnessed accounts to be presented to the jury because of Simpson's Sixth Amendment rights.

The letters Nicole Brown had written and the statements she made to friends and family were ruled inadmissible as hearsay because Brown was dead and unable to be cross-examined.

Despite this, the prosecution had witnesses for 44 separate incidents they planned to present to the jury. However, the prosecution dropped the domestic violence portion of their case on June 20, Christopher Darden later confirmed that to be true.

This dismissal of Simpson's abusive behavior from a female juror, who was also a victim of such abuse by her own husband, convinced the prosecution that the jury was not receptive to the domestic violence argument.

The defense retained renowned advocate for victims of domestic abuse, Dr. Lenore E. Walker was dropped from the witness list for "tactical reasons" after she submitted her report on the case.

The revelation of Simpson's abuse of Nicole is credited with turning public opinion against him. Walker was dropped from the defense witness list is credited with transforming public opinion on spousal abuse from a private familial matter to a serious public health issue.

Lakshmanan Sathyavagiswaran, testified on June 14, that Brown's time of death was estimated as between pm and pm. Simpson was not seen again until pm when he answered the intercom at the front door for the limousine driver, Allan Park.

Allan Park testified on March 28, that he arrived at Simpson's home at pm on the night of the murders and stopped at the Rockingham entrance: Simpson's Bronco was not there.

Park's testimony was significant because it explained the location of the glove found at Simpson's home. Park said the "shadowy figure" initially approached the front door before heading down the southern walkway which leads to where the glove was found by Fuhrman.

The prosecution believed that Simpson had driven his Bronco to and from Brown's home to commit the murders, saw that Park was there and aborted his attempt to enter through the front door and tried to enter through the back instead.

During cross examination, Park conceded that he could not identify the figure but said he saw that person enter the front door and afterwards Simpson answered and said he was home alone but he was calling a friend over.

Park conceded that he did not notice any cuts on Simpson's left hand but added "I shook his right hand, not his left.

The prosecution presented a total of exhibits, including 61 drops of blood, [] of DNA evidence allegedly linking Simpson to the murders.

With no witnesses to the crime, the prosecution was dependent on DNA as the only physical evidence linking Simpson to the crime.

Bodziak, testified that the bloody shoe prints found at the crime scene and inside Simpson's Bronco were made from a rare and expensive pair of Bruno Magli Italian shoes.

He determined the shoes were a size 12, the same size that Simpson wears, and are only sold at Bloomingdales. Only 29 pairs of that size were sold in the U.

Bodziak also testified that, despite two sets of footprints at the crime scene, only one attacker was present because they were all made by the same shoes.

During cross-examination Bailey suggested the murderer deliberately wore shoes that were the wrong size, which Bodziak dismissed as "ridiculous".

Simpson denied ever owning a pair of those "ugly ass shoes" and there was only circumstantial evidence he did. Although the prosecution could not prove that Simpson owned a pair of those shoes, Bodziak testified that a similar bloody shoe print was left on the floor inside Simpson's Bronco.

Scheck suggested that Fuhrman broke into the Bronco and left the footprint there; he produced a photo of Fuhrman walking through a puddle of blood.

Bodziak admitted that he was not able to confirm that the shoe print in the car definitely came from a Bruno Magli shoe, but dismissed Scheck's claim because none of the shoe prints at the crime scene were made by Fuhrman's shoes, making it unlikely he could have made a bloody shoe print in the Bronco.

Simpson hired a team of high-profile defense lawyers, initially led by Robert Shapiro , who was previously a civil lawyer known for settling, and then subsequently by Johnnie Cochran, who at that point was known for police brutality and civil rights cases.

Assisting Cochran were Carl E. Douglas and Shawn Holley. The defense team's reasonable doubt theory was summarized as "compromised, contaminated, corrupted" in opening statements.

Robert Huizenga testified on July 14, [] that Simpson was not physically capable of carrying out the murders due to chronic arthritis and old football injuries.

During cross-examination, the prosecution produced an exercise video that Simpson made a few weeks before the murders titled O. Simpson Minimum Maintenance: Fitness for Men , which demonstrated that Simpson was anything but frail.

Huizenga admitted afterwards that Simpson could have committed the murders if he was in "the throes of an adrenaline rush.

Michael Baden , a forensic pathologist, testified on August 10, [] and claimed the murders happened closer to pm, which is when Simpson has an alibi.

After the trial, Baden admitted his claim of Goldman's long struggle was inaccurate [] [] and that testifying for Simpson was a mistake.

Gerdes admitted [] that Goldman's blood was in Simpson's Bronco [] despite Goldman never having an opportunity within his lifetime to be in the Bronco.

Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld argued that the results from the DNA testing were not reliable because the police were "sloppy" in collecting and preserving it from the crime scene.

The prosecution denied that the mistakes made by Fung and Mazzola changed the validity of the results. The contamination claim was made by microbiologist Dr.

John Gerdes. It is chronic in the sense that it doesn't go away. During cross-examination, Dr. Gerdes admitted there was no evidence that cross-contamination had occurred and that he was only testifying to "what might have occurred and not what actually did occur".

He accepted that the victims' blood was in the Bronco and Simpson's blood was at the crime scene and neither was due to contamination.

He also conceded that nothing happened during "packaging and shipping" that would affect the validity of the results at the two consulting labs.

The prosecution implied that Gerdes was not a credible witness: he had no forensic experience and had only testified for criminal defendants in the past and always said the DNA evidence against them was not reliable due to contamination.

Clark also implied that it was not a coincidence that the three evidence items he initially said were valid were the same three the defense claimed were planted while the other 58 were all false positives and the 47 substrate controls, which are used to determine if contamination occurred, were all false negatives.

Henry Lee testified on August 24, and admitted that Gerdes's claim was "highly improbable". Barry Scheck's eight-day cross-examination of Dennis Fung was lauded in the media.

What contamination and degradation will lead you to is an inconclusive result. It doesn't lead you to a false positive.

The defense initially only claimed that three exhibits were planted by the police [] but eventually argued that virtually all of the blood evidence against Simpson was planted in a police conspiracy.

In closing arguments, Cochran called Fuhrman and Vannatter "twins of deception" [] and told the jury to remember Vannatter as "the man who carried the blood" [] and Fuhrman as "the man who found the glove.

The only physical evidence offered by the defense that the police tried to frame Simpson was the allegation that two of the DNA evidence samples tested in the case contained the preservative Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid , or EDTA.

Ironically, it was the prosecution who asked to have the samples tested for the preservative, not the defense. In order to support the claim, the defense pointed to the presence of EDTA , a preservative found in the purple-topped collection tubes used for police reference vials, in the samples.

On July 24, , Dr. Fredric Rieders , a forensic toxicologist who had analysed results provided by FBI special agent Roger Martz, testified that the level of EDTA in the evidence samples was higher than that which is normally found in blood: this appeared to support the claim they came from the reference vials.

Rieders to read out loud the portion of the EPA article that stated what the normal levels of EDTA in blood are, which he referenced during his testimony.

Rieders then claimed it was a "typo" [] [] but the prosecution produced a direct copy from the EPA disproving that claim. Rieders the day before. When the defense accused their own witness of changing his demeanor to favor the prosecution, he replied "I cannot be entirely truthful by only giving 'yes' and 'no' answers".

Martz also tested his own unpreserved blood and got the same results for EDTA levels as the evidence samples, which he said conclusively disproved the claim the evidence blood came from the reference vials.

The defense alleged that Simpson's blood on the back gate at the Bundy crime scene was planted by the police. The blood on the back gate was collected on July 3, , rather than June 13, the day after the murders.

The volume of DNA was so high that the defense conceded that it could not be explained by contamination in the lab, yet noted that it was unusual for that blood to have more DNA on it than the other samples collected at the crime scene, especially since it had been left exposed to the elements for several weeks and after the crime scene had supposedly been washed over.

On March 20, Detective Vannatter testified that he instructed Fung to collect the blood on the gate on June 13 and Fung admitted he had not done so.

The prosecution responded by showing that a different photograph showed that the blood was present on the back gate on June 13 and before the blood had been taken from Simpson's arm.

Barry Scheck alleged the police had twice planted the victims' blood inside Simpson's Bronco. An initial collection was made on June 13; the defense accused Vannatter of planting the victims' blood in the Bronco when he returned to Simpson's home later that evening.

The prosecution responded that the Bronco had already been impounded by the time Vannatter returned and was not even at Rockingham.

The defense alleged that the police had planted Brown's blood on the socks found in Simpson's bedroom. The socks were collected on June 13 and had blood from both Simpson and Brown, but her blood on the socks was not identified until August 4.

He had received both blood reference vials from the victims earlier that day from the coroner and booked them immediately into evidence.

Vannatter then drove back to Rockingham later that evening to hand deliver the reference vial for Simpson to Fung, which the defense alleged gave him opportunity to plant the blood.

Fung testified he could not see blood on the socks he collected from Simpson's bedroom [] but the prosecution later demonstrated that those blood stains are only visible underneath a microscope.

Detective Vannatter denied planting Nicole Brown's blood on the socks. The video from Willie Ford indicated that the socks had already been collected and stored in the evidence van before Vannatter arrived and footage from the media cameras present appeared to prove that he never went inside the evidence van when he arrived at Rockingham.

The last exhibit allegedly planted was the bloody glove found at Simpson's property by Detective Mark Fuhrman. Robert Shapiro later admitted he was Toobin's source.

Defense attorney F. Lee Bailey suggested that Fuhrman found the glove at the crime scene, picked it up with a stick and placed it in a plastic bag, and then concealed it in his sock when he drove to Simpson's home with Detectives Lange, Vannatter and Philips.

Bailey suggested that he then planted the glove in order to frame Simpson, with the motive either being racism or a desire to become the hero in a high-profile case.

The prosecution denied that Fuhrman planted the glove. They noted that several officers had already combed over the crime scene for almost two hours before Fuhrman arrived and none had noticed a second glove at the scene.

Detective Lange testified that 14 other officers were there when Fuhrman arrived and all said there was only one glove at the crime scene.

Frank Spangler also testified that he was with Fuhrman for the duration of his time there and stated he would have seen Fuhrman purloin the glove if he had in fact done so.

Clark added that Fuhrman did not know whether Simpson had an alibi, if there were any witnesses to the murders, whose blood was on the glove, that the Bronco belonged to Simpson, or whether Kaelin had already searched the area where the glove was found.

During cross-examination by Bailey, [] Fuhrman denied that he had used the word "nigger" to describe African Americans in the ten years prior to his testimony.

The tapes were made between and by screenwriter named Laura Hart McKinny, who had interviewed Fuhrman at length for a Hollywood screenplay she was writing on women police officers.

The Fuhrman tapes became the cornerstone of the defense's case that Fuhrman's testimony lacked credibility. Clark called the tapes "the biggest red herring there ever was.

After McKinny was forced to hand over the tapes to the defense, Fuhrman says he asked the prosecution for a redirect to explain the context of those tapes but the prosecution and his fellow police officers abandoned him after Ito played the audiotapes in open court for the public to hear.

Fuhrman says he instantly became a pariah. On September 6, , Fuhrman was called back to the witness stand by the defense, after the prosecution refused to redirect him, to answer more questions.

The jury was absent but the exchange was televised. Fuhrman, with his lawyer standing by his side and facing the possibility of being charged with Perjury , was instructed by his attorney to invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination to two consecutive questions he was asked.

Defense attorney Uelmen asked Fuhrman if it was his intention to plead the Fifth to all questions, and Fuhrman's attorney instructed him to reply "yes".

Uelmen then briefly spoke with the other members of the defense and said he had just one more question: "Did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case?

Cochran responded to Fuhrman's pleading the Fifth by accusing the other officers of being involved in a "cover-up" to protect Fuhrman and asked Judge Ito to suppress all of the evidence that Fuhrman found.

Ito denied the request, stating that pleading the fifth does not imply guilt and there was no evidence of fraud. Cochran then asked that the jury be allowed to hear Fuhrman taking the fifth and again Ito denied his request.

Ito also criticized the defense's theory of how Fuhrman allegedly planted the glove stating "it would strain logic to believe that".

On June 15, , Christopher Darden surprised Marcia Clark by asking Simpson to try on the gloves found at the crime scene and his home.

The prosecution had earlier decided against asking Simpson to try them on because they had been soaked in blood from Simpson, Brown and Goldman, [62] and frozen and unfrozen several times.

Instead they presented a witness who testified that Nicole Brown had purchased a pair of those gloves in the same size in at Bloomingdales for Simpson along with a receipt and a photo during the trial of Simpson earlier wearing the same type of gloves.

The leather gloves appeared too tight for Simpson to put on easily, especially over the latex gloves he wore underneath.

Clark claimed that Simpson was acting when he appeared to be struggling to put on the gloves, yet Cochran replied "I don't think he could act the size of his hands.

The prosecution stated they believed the gloves shrank from having been soaked in the blood of the victims. He stated "the gloves in the original condition would easily go onto the hand of someone of Mr.

Simpson's size. After the trial, Cochran revealed that Bailey had goaded Darden into asking Simpson to try on the gloves [] and that Shapiro had told Simpson in advance how to give the appearance that they did not fit.

This article is more than 12 years old. Jill Clark. Robert Kardashian : A close friend of Simpson and an attorney who would go on to participate in the trial as part of Simpson's defense team.

Kardashian died at age 59 in from esophageal cancer. Alan Dershowitz : Dershowitz played a major role in Simpson's defense team. He retired in after 50 years of teaching at Harvard University.

Dershowitz has written 30 books. Mark Fuhrman : The former Los Angeles Police Department detective gave testimony about finding the infamous bloody glove, but the defense tried to paint Fuhrman as a racist who planted the glove to frame Simpson.

He lied about using racial slurs and pleaded no contest to perjury charges. He is a forensic and crime scene expert for FOX News. Kato Kaelin : Kaelin lived in Simpson's guest house at the time of the murders, and he was called to the stand as a witness during the trial.

Since the trial, Kaelin has done some acting, hosts his own show in Beverly Hills and is part of a clothing line called "Kato's Kouch Potatoes.

Fred Goldman : Ron Goldman's mourning father was outspoken in demanding justice for his son. He filed a wrongful-death lawsuit against Simpson in after Simpson was cleared of criminal charges in the murders.

Kim Goldman : Ronald Goldman's sister, Kim, testified during the trial. In May , Goldman wrote a book about her brother's death and her experiences with the trial, telling CNN it had taken the last decade-plus years for her to find her voice.

Denise Brown : Nicole Brown Simpson's sister, Denise, testified in the murder trial that her sister was an abused wife.

In , Brown started a group for public speakers on domestic violence, sexual assault, mental health and more, called The Elite Speaker's Bureau, Inc.

Allan Park : Park was the limousine driver who drove Simpson to the Los Angeles airport the night of the murders. Daraufhin kehrte er an den Tatort zurück, um die — seiner Aussage nach immer noch vorhandenen — Blutspuren zu sichern.

Trotz der verspäteten Sicherung und der damit verbundenen stärkeren Gefahr einer Zersetzung vorhandener DNA durch Sonnenlicht und andere Umwelteinflüsse fand sich in der nachträglich gesicherten Blutspur im Vergleich zu anderen zeitnah nach der Tat gesicherten Spuren eine teils über fach höhere Konzentration an verwertbarer DNA.

Rieders führte keine eigenen Tests durch, sondern sagte nur zu seiner eigenen Interpretation der Analyseergebnisse des FBI aus.

Die Verteidiger Simpsons behaupteten, die nachträglich gesicherten Blutspuren stammten aus dem von Simpson entnommenen Blut und seien am Tatort platziert worden, um Simpson zu belasten.

Rieders und Martz gaben übereinstimmend an, dass die in den Blutspuren gefundene EDTA-Menge zu gering sei, als dass es sich um präpariertes Blut eines Verdächtigen gehandelt haben könnte.

EDTA könne jedoch durch Sonnenlichtexposition zersetzt werden. EDTA sei ein künstlicher Stoff, der in der Natur eigentlich nicht vorkomme, jedoch in vielen Produkten und Nahrungsmitteln enthalten sei und auf diese Weise in den menschlichen Körper gelangen könne.

In einer zweiten Analyse bei einem anderen Labor mit vermeintlich besseren Analyseverfahren wurden diese Gifte jedoch nicht gefunden, woraufhin die Anklage fallengelassen wurde.

Der für die Beweissicherung am Tatort verantwortliche Kriminalist Dennis Fung habe grundlegende Regeln der Ermittlungsarbeit missachtet.

Fung wurde insgesamt 9 Tage im Kreuzverhör vernommen — so lang wie kein anderer Zeuge. Fung verneinte, dies getan zu haben, seine Aussage wurde jedoch durch ein Video vom Tag der Beweissicherung widerlegt.

Diese habe Blutproben vertauscht und nicht richtig beschriftet. Mazzola räumte ein, einige Proben nicht direkt katalogisiert zu haben.

Darüber hinaus führten Simpsons Verteidiger ein internes Schulungsvideo der Polizei vor, in dem Mazzola Beweissicherungstechniken vorführt und dabei verschiedene Fehler begeht.

Während der Beweissicherung sei zudem Browns Hund nicht vom Tatort ferngehalten worden. Nach Simpsons Vernehmung am Juni wurde seine freiwillig abgegebene Blutprobe von Philip Vannatter in Empfang genommen.

Dieser hatte den Blutbehälter nach eigenen Angaben mehrere Stunden in seinem Besitz, da der zuständige Kriminalist am Tatort verweilt habe und er ihm die Blutprobe zur Katalogisierung als Beweisstück habe übergeben müssen.

Vannatter transportierte die Probe in einem unverschlossenen Umschlag. Die Übergabe an Fung sei erst mehrere Stunden später geschehen, als Vannatter ebenfalls am Tatort eintraf.

Simpsons Ford Bronco, in dem Blutspuren gefunden wurden, die ihm und beiden Mordopfern zugeordnet wurden, befand sich seit dem Juni in Polizeigewahrsam.

Zwei Tage später brachen unbekannte Täter in das Fahrzeug ein. Auch habe er mit insgesamt 23 Proben gleichzeitig hantiert, anstatt wie empfohlen nur mit Fuhrman und Vannatter hätten Beweise gegen Simpson manipuliert, um diesem die Tat anzuhängen.

Fuhrman habe dies aufgrund seiner rassistischen Einstellung gewollt, Vannatter habe eine klare Verurteilung angestrebt, um den prominenten Fall nicht zu verlieren.

Die beiden Ermittler hätten wissentlich Grundregeln der Polizeiarbeit missachtet und auch unter Eid immer wieder gelogen.

Vannatter habe Simpsons Blut mit sich geführt und auf dessen Anwesen und am Tatort verteilt. So sei auch zu erklären, dass von Simpsons Blutprobe 1,5 Milliliter fehlten.

Fuhrman habe den blutigen Handschuh vom Tatort zu Simpsons Haus gebracht, mit dem von Vannatter mitgeführten Blut Simpsons kontaminiert, auf dem Grundstück platziert, und dann als dort vorgefundenes Beweisstück präsentiert.

Zeugen der Polizei hätten im Kreuzverhör zugegeben, dass ein Teil von Simpsons Blut bei der Analyse verschüttet wurde.

Die DNA-Spuren eines möglichen anderen Täters seien am Tatort nicht mehr nachweisbar, da sie sich aufgrund der falschen Lagerung und unzeitigen Sicherung der Proben zersetzt haben.

Simpsons Blutspuren am Tatort seien entweder absichtlich platziert worden oder das Ergebnis einer Kontaminierung durch fehlerhafte Arbeit der beteiligten Kriminalisten und Analysten.

Daher seien auch alle Analysen, die teilweise von anderen Stellen z. Die Verschwörungstheorie von Simpsons Verteidigern wurde von der Staatsanwaltschaft und zahlreichen Prozessbeobachtern scharf kritisiert.

In seinem Kommentar zum Strafprozess gegen Simpson merkte der frühere Staatsanwalt Vincent Bugliosi an, Fuhrman und Vannatter hätten sich durch eine Beweismanipulation einem extremen Risiko ausgesetzt.

Für einen Doppelmord kann nach kalifornischem Recht die Todesstrafe verhängt werden. Zum Zeitpunkt der Ermittlungen war noch nicht klar, dass die Staatsanwaltschaft diese nicht beantragen würde.

Nach Sektion des Strafrechts des Staates Kalifornien kann für eine Falschaussage vor Gericht, die zu einer Exekution einer unschuldigen Person führt, ebenfalls die Todesstrafe verhängt werden.

Dutzende Blutspuren am Tatort, in Simpsons Bronco und auf dessen Anwesen seien jedoch ihm oder den Opfern zugeordnet worden.

Bugliosi argumentierte weiter, Fuhrman und Vannatter hätten in unterschiedlichen Abteilungen gearbeitet und sich vor dem Mordfall Simpson nicht persönlich gekannt.

Keiner sagte aus, einen zweiten Handschuh gesehen oder Manipulationen durch Fuhrman oder Vannatter bemerkt zu haben. Zudem hätte Fuhrman den Handschuh im Beisein anderer Beamter zu Simpsons Anwesen transportieren und dort deponieren müssen.

Dies sei unbemerkt kaum zu schaffen. Andere Polizeibeamte hätten also seine Beweismanipulation decken müssen.

Vannatter war erst am Juni in den Besitz von Simpsons Blutprobe gelangt, als über den Mord bereits weitläufig in den Medien berichtet wurde.

Er hätte seine Beweismanipulationen also trotz der Anwesenheit von hunderten Schaulustigen, Medienvertretern und Dutzenden Polizeibeamten begehen müssen.

Generell mache es gerade für Vannatter wenig Sinn, Simpsons Blut auf dessen Anwesen zu platzieren, da er selbst Simpson noch am Vormittag verhört hatte und Simpson angegeben hatte, sich in der Tatnacht zu Hause geschnitten und in und vor seinem Haus geblutet zu haben.

Vannatter hätte diesen bereits vorhandenen Spuren allenfalls weitere hinzufügen können. Die Behauptung der Verteidigung, Fuhrman und Vannatter hätten Hand in Hand, gegebenenfalls mit dem Wissen oder sogar der Mithilfe weiterer Polizisten, für eine gezielte Belastung Simpsons gesorgt, sei vor diesem Hintergrund geradezu absurd.

Vor dem Hintergrund der zahlreichen zusätzlichen Indizien sei Simpsons Schuld eindeutig bewiesen. Ein Freispruch Simpsons könne nur gerechtfertigt werden, wenn man der Behauptung Glauben schenkt, dass alle Blutspuren Simpsons am Tatort sowie auch die Blutspuren der Opfer auf Simpsons Anwesen auf eine Verschwörung oder auf Kontamination zurückgeführt werden können.

Die Jury habe eine solche Verschwörung ganz offensichtlich für glaubwürdiger gehalten als die simple Theorie der Staatsanwaltschaft, ein eifersüchtiger Mann mit einer langen Vorgeschichte häuslicher Gewalt habe seine Ex-Frau ermordet.

Simpson für die Tatzeit — einem Sonntagabend — kein Alibi hatte, was bei einem Prominenten wie Simpson, der generell wenig Zeit alleine verbringt, als eher unwahrscheinlich zu bewerten sei.

Ihre Beweismanipulation, insbesondere die Platzierung des Handschuhs, hätte sonst zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt deutlich werden können.

Die Polizisten hätten sich folglich einem irrationalen Risiko ausgesetzt. Dies gilt insbesondere für Vannatter, der kurz davor war, in Ruhestand zu treten.

Sie tauche jedoch nur bei Proben auf, die in Verbindung zum Fall Simpson stehen. Park war ein enorm wichtiger Zeuge für die Anklage, da er die erste Person war, die Simpson nach dem vermuteten Zeitpunkt der Morde gesehen hat.

Er wurde von den Prozessbeteiligten weitgehend übereinstimmend als glaubwürdiger Zeuge betrachtet. Seine Aussagen zu den Zeitpunkten bestimmter Vorkommnisse gelten als besonders verlässlich, da es ihm als Fahrer wichtig war, zu der verabredeten Zeit auch vor Ort zu sein — zumal es sich bei seinem Kunden um einen Prominenten handelte.

Es sei daher glaubwürdig, dass er besonders häufig auf die Uhr gesehen habe und sich die Zeiten gut merken konnte.

Zu diesen Gesprächen liegen Verbindungsdaten vor. Park gab in seiner Vernehmung an, um Uhr an Simpsons Anwesen eingetroffen zu sein.

Daraufhin habe er gewartet und eine Zigarette geraucht. Um Uhr habe er dann über die Sprechanlage bei Simpson geklingelt. Es sei kein Licht im Haus zu sehen gewesen und niemand habe die Tür geöffnet.

Danach habe er mehrere Telefonate geführt und mehrere weitere Male geklingelt. Um Uhr rief sein Chef ihn zurück und sagte, er solle bis Uhr warten, da Simpson oft zu spät komme.

Er habe dann seinem Chef gesagt, es sei doch jemand zu Hause, und aufgelegt. Danach klingelte er erneut. Diesmal meldete sich Simpson nach etwa einer Minute.

Er gab an, er habe verschlafen und sei gerade aus der Dusche gekommen. Simpson hatte fünf Gepäckstücke.

Bei einem dieser Gepäckstücke, einer dunklen Stofftasche, bestand Simpson darauf, es selbst ins Auto zu bringen und nicht wie sein übriges Gepäck von Park oder Kato Kaelin einladen zu lassen.

Park bemerkte keine Schnittwunden oder sonstige Verletzungen an Simpson. Laut Park handelte es sich um eine milde Sommernacht. In seinen Flug nach Chicago checkte Simpson mit nur drei Gepäckstücken ein.

Damit hätte er genug Zeit gehabt, die Morde zwischen Uhr und Uhr zu verüben. In der Tasche, die Simpson auffälligerweise selbst einladen wollte, vermutet die Staatsanwaltschaft die Tatwaffe und seine blutige Kleidung.

Diese habe er am Flughafen in einem Mülleimer entsorgt. Kato Kaelin , ein bis dato weitgehend erfolgloser Schauspieler , wohnte zum Zeitpunkt der Morde als Hausgast in einem Gästezimmer in Simpsons Hinterhaus.

Kaelin hatte zuvor als Untermieter bei Nicole Simpson gewohnt, sei jedoch nur platonisch mit ihr befreundet gewesen. Kaelin war ursprünglich ein Zeuge der Anklage.

Diese Vermutung ergab sich aufgrund der Tatsache, dass Kaelin kostenlos bei Simpson wohne und sich von dessen Beziehungen Vorteile für seine Schauspielkarriere erhoffe.

Er hätte Simpson also ein Alibi verschaffen können, sagte jedoch aus, Simpson in der Tatnacht zwischen h und h nicht gesehen zu haben und keine Angaben zu dessen Aufenthaltsort während des fraglichen Zeitraums machen zu können.

Er habe dabei behilflich sein wollen, was Simpson jedoch ausdrücklich ablehnte. So sei Simpson bereits bei ihrer ersten Verabredung, als Zlomsowitch sich mit Brown in ein Restaurant zum Abendessen begeben hatte, an ihren Tisch gekommen und habe in bedrohlichen Tonfall gesagt "Ich bin O.

Simpson und dies ist immer noch meine Ehefrau". Auch bei der zweiten Verabredung des Paares sei Simpson im selben Lokal anwesend gewesen.

Am folgenden Tag sei Simpson erneut bei Browns Haus erschienen und habe ihm mitgeteilt, dass er ihn und Brown am Vorabend beobachtet habe.

Von Simpsons Verteidigern und in den Medien wurden über verschiedene Theorien zu möglichen anderen Tätern vorgebracht, wobei nach weit überwiegender Meinung von Kommentatoren und Prozessbeobachtern für keine der Theorien glaubwürdige Belege vorliegen.

Im Prozess gegen Simpson versuchten dessen Anwälte auf mögliche andere Täterkreise zu verweisen, was jedoch von Richter Ito mit Hinweis auf die Implausibilität dieser Theorie abgelehnt wurde.

Oj Simpson Fall Und doch soll es plötzlich seine Hautfarbe sein, die ihn fast ins Gefängnis bringt. Das viele Blut. Mini Kraft Spielen Kostenlos Lie Testabgerufen am Deren Darstellung und Analyse im Prozess war jedoch eine trockene, für die Geschworenen ermüdende Angelegenheit, während sich die Anprobe des Handschuhs anschaulicher darstellte.
Oj Simpson Fall


3 Kommentare

  1. Ich entschuldige mich, aber meiner Meinung nach lassen Sie den Fehler zu. Ich kann die Position verteidigen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.

Kommentar hinterlassen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.